Your team, thoughtfully built.
How to Compare Vendor Proposals With AI
To compare vendor proposals with AI, write your scorecard before you read the proposals, then ask for each one filled in against the same criteria, with the clause that supports every cell and "not stated" where a proposal is silent. It shows you the differences and the gaps. The decision to buy stays with whoever is authorized to make it.
The example is a made-up studio buying brochure printing.
Set the criteria first
The studio needs 500 copies, a proof to approve before printing, and delivery by a set date.
- Proposal A: 500 copies for $500, delivery included.
- Proposal B: 500 copies for $450. Delivery not mentioned.
- Neither confirms the date.
Give it your requirements, your budget limit and the proposals. Check that quantities and currencies match before anything is compared. Proposals are confidential. Material included in a model request goes to your AI provider, so share only what you are allowed to share.
The request
The request: "Compare proposals A and B below on quantity, delivery, proof approval and the required date. Cite the clause each answer comes from. Write 'Not stated' where a proposal doesn't say, and list the questions we should send. Do not sign, buy, contact the vendors or infer any terms."
What comes back
- Quantity: both say 500.
- Delivery: A includes it. B: not stated.
- Proof approval: check each proposal's process before giving credit for it.
- Date: neither confirms it in writing.
- To ask: B's delivery terms, and the date from both.
The mistake to watch for
The cheaper one that isn't. B's price is lower and B doesn't mention delivery. A comparison that ranks B first has compared a price with delivery to a price without it. Until B answers, you don't know which is cheaper, and the scorecard should say that, not hide it behind a total.
The same goes for a gap filled with an assumption. "Delivery is typically around" some figure is a number nobody quoted. A scorecard with one invented cell is worse than one with an honest blank, because you can't tell which cell it is.
And write the criteria first for a reason. Read the proposals first and you will find yourself weighting whatever the best brochure of the two happens to be good at.
When the answers come back
Add each vendor's reply with its date, and keep quoted terms apart from anything assumed. Check the final order against the current proposals before it goes through your normal approval. The comparison makes the trade-offs visible. It does not vouch for a vendor.
Run it in your Staffmor office
Open the office on the computer running it with its Start Staffmor launcher. If you already have a paired web office, open it here. Paste this request and the source material into the conversation. Use your approved Codex connection, or ask your open Claude Code session to "Check Staffmor for work." A saved request is not a completed result. Review the answer or file when it comes back and reply with corrections. Ask a second pass to check each cell against the clause it cites.
Staffmor builds the comparison from the documents you give it. Contacting vendors and committing to a purchase stay with you. New to Staffmor? Set up your office with Codex or Claude Code and an empty folder. Use your own supported AI account and approve the download, office activation and local folder/network access during setup. Claude Code pickup is manual; keep that local session open.
Related: How to streamline an existing business with AI agents · How to write instructions AI agents actually follow