Your team, thoughtfully built.

What to Review Before You Use AI Work

By Staffmor Staff

Practical guides from the team building Staffmor.

Review AI work in proportion to what happens if it is wrong. An internal draft needs a fact and tone check. Anything that reaches a customer, states a policy, moves money or changes access needs the approval of the person responsible for it. An assistant can organize that review. It cannot give permission.

The example is a made-up workshop team that hands back three things at once.

Start with where the work is going

A welcome email goes to customers. Its arrival facts have to be right.
A refund FAQ states policy. Every line is a commitment.
A launch schedule stays inside the team.

They came from one task, and they do not deserve the same review. Ask of each: who sees it, and can it be taken back? A schedule can be fixed tomorrow. A sent email cannot be unsent.

The request

The request: "Review these three items against the approved source notes below. List factual mismatches, claims the notes don't support, policy decisions that are missing, and who has to approve each thing before it goes outside the team. Keep findings separate from suggestions. Do not send, publish or change any permissions."

What comes back

Email: it says 9 a.m. and the source says 10 a.m. Fix the time; the sender approves the final copy.
Refund FAQ: it offers a 48-hour refund window that appears in no source. Hold it; the policy owner decides.
Schedule: the venue task is still open. The launch owner decides whether that blocks the launch.

Three findings, each with one owner. That is a review you can act on. A warning on every line is one you will stop reading.

The mistakes to watch for

Treating agreement as checking. A second AI that reads the draft and says it looks right has compared the draft with itself. A real check compares the claim with the source document.

The invented policy. The 48-hour refund line is the dangerous one, because it is reasonable. It sounds like a policy you might have. If nobody decided it, it is not yours.

Reviewing forever. Once the wrong time is fixed, re-check the time. You do not need to review the whole email again, and you do not need a third pass on work that has not changed.

Record what was approved

Note the final version, who approved it, when, and what was actually done with it. "Approved to publish" and "published" are different facts. If a send fails and you are not sure whether it went, check before you send again.

For legal, financial or medical decisions, the reviewer is the qualified person, however good the draft looks.

Run it in your Staffmor office

Open the office on the computer running it with its Start Staffmor launcher. If you already have a paired web office, open it here. Paste this request and the source material into the conversation. Use your approved Codex connection, or ask your open Claude Code session to "Check Staffmor for work." A saved request is not a completed result. Review the answer or file when it comes back and reply with corrections. Ask for the findings as a list with one owner each.

Staffmor drafts, compares and keeps the review notes with the task. Approval, and anything that leaves the team, stays with you. New to Staffmor? Set up your office with Codex or Claude Code and an empty folder. Use your own supported AI account and approve the download, office activation and local folder/network access during setup. Claude Code pickup is manual; keep that local session open.